Claimants’ time limit for filing Rejoinder to Counterclaim for revocation and the Reply to conditional application to amend extended on grounds of fairness and equity, since the previous time limit was, with the consent of the Claimant, extended to a similar extent in favour of the Defendants. (R. 9 RoP, R. 29(e) RoP ...

Infringement of 4G standard essential patent: permanent injunction granted (Article 63 UPCA), Order to communicate information (Article 67 UPCA), Award of damages, provisional damages of € 250.000 (Article 68 UPCA). Given the interpretation of the patent claim (Article 69 EPC): The patent is valid, revocation dismissed...

Rectification of the name of Defendant 1) granted (R. 9 RoP, R. 272 RoP). The date of service on Nintendo of Europe SE is determined to be effected 17 October. Based on the facts, there was no doubt that it had been clear to the Nintendo of Europe SE that the statement of claim was intended to be directed against it as...

Confidentiality Club not limited to outside lawyers only without consent (R. 262A RoP): Access to the confidential version of the statements on transfer of the patent suit and partially redacted Patent Transfer Agreement extended to legal counsel of Xiaomi. Local divisions of the UPC have not granted an “outside...

Withdrawal of application for provisional measures: 60% of court fees reimbursed (R. 206 RoP), R. 370(9)(b)(i) RoP). Withdrawal of application for provisional measures one day after application was filed (i.e., before closure of written procedure). Application of R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP by analogy 

Criteria for security for costs of a party (R. 158 RoP) Failing any guarantees or other special circumstances […] it is not relevant whether the claimant belongs to a - financially sound - group of companies. It is only the financial position of the claimant itself that is relevant. Whether a claimant is willing to...

Appeal closed by a decision by default against appellant because of failure to pay regular fee (R. 357 RoP, R. 378 RoP, R. 378A RoP). The request to waive the additional fee ordered in the Order issued on 7 November 2024 denied; The Application for legal aid denied; The Appellant bears the costs of the appeal...

Discretionary review of an order of judge-rapporteur on security for costs and denying leave to appeal granted because of an access to justice issue which has not yet been decided and which the Court of Appeal can raise of its own motion (R. 220.3 RoP, Article 69(4) UPCA, R. 158 RoP, R. 333 RoP)

Late filed request (R. 9.2 RoP). Defendants request of 16 October 2024 that the court asks questions to the European Commission rejected because it is late filed. After oral hearing held on 24 September 2024, without the court allowing any post-hearing submission

Revocation EP 911 dismissed. To provide legal certainty an objective approach to be applied to evaluation of inventive step (Article 56 EPC). The person skilled in the art is an element of this objective approach. Subjective considerations, a subjective motivation to make specific modifications to the prior art or the...

EP 115 revoked. Added subject matter (Article 138(1)(c) EPC): No parts of the disclosure that would show the skilled person a preferred embodiment, in which the mouthpiece is affixed to a second end of the fluid storage compartment without enclosing the fluid storage compartment. Court may amend the patent, independent...

Provisional injunction lifted (Article 62 UPCA, R. 211 RoP). Not more likely than not that the patent is infringed. it is not more likely than not that the contested embodiments realise feature 1.3 of claim 1. No need to examine the other grounds brought forward by the parties, given the assessment in relation to...

IPPT20241113, UPC CFI, LD Paris, HP v Lama
Claim construction in language of the patent (Article 69 EPC). Appropriate in French language proceedings to examine all arguments raised in relation to the interpretation of the patent with reference to the patent application as filed in English. Novelty (article 54 EPC). To...

Patent infringement uncontested. No basis for staying the action for infringement because of pending revocation proceedings, where the defendant has not contested the validity of the patent nor the infringement (R. 295 RoP, R. 171(2) RoP). Permanent injunction granted to prohibit repetition and prohibit future conduct ...

Ballinno ordered to provide security for legal cost of claimant  Kinexon in revocation action (Article 69(4) UPCA, R. 158 RoP). It is not necessary that the party claiming security has the formal position of a defendant in the lawsuit in which it claims security. It only matters whether it reacts to a claim of the...

Preliminary objection dismissed (R. 19 RoP). Parallel jurisdiction during the transitional period also includes actions for a declaration of non-infringement, although such actions are not explicitly mentioned in Article 83.1 UPCA. An action for a declaration of non-infringement is, after all, the mirror of an action...

Application to file a reply to the Statement of  response rejected (R. 36 RoP, R. 222.2(a) RoP). The fact that Hand Held Products defended the court's interpretation in the response to the appeal with reference to paragraph [0063] does not justify allowing the filing of a reply. Scandit has not substantiated why Hand...

Request rejected to allow further written submissions regarding new product version (‘Barryvox S’) (R. 36 RoP). Time available until the date of the oral hearing (26 November 2024) clearly insufficient for (i) further legal classification and treatment thereof, as well as (ii) a reasonable period of time for the...

Further written pleading rejected (R. 36 RoP). Would lead to a delay in the proceedings. In view of the oral hearing, which is already scheduled for December, such a delay would be unacceptable to both the Court and the Defendants. The Claimant’s right to be heard is not unduly restricted by the rejection. New factual...

A reasoned request for information under R. 191 RoP must sufficiently specify which information is requested and for what reasons. The requesting party may assert a fact that it believes to be true without fear of being accused of failing to furnish the court with truthful facts simply because the opposing party...