Direct patent infringement (Article 25 UPCA); Injunction for Germany, France and Sweden, recall, destruction, providing information, to compensate for damages. Mere use of subclaims as additional arguments at the oral hearing to support a previous position taken by Claimant is not considered late (R. 263 RoP, Article...

Security for costs dismissed (R. 158 RoP). It is sufficient for a defendant to establish that enforcement of a cost order is unduly burdensome. The burden of showing this is on the applicant of an order for security for costs. To this end, the applicant shall not only provide evidence as to the foreign law applicable...

Applicant granted access (R. 262 RoP) to the written pleadings and evidence lodged by the parties in the [first instance] Revocation action, subject to the redaction of personal data. The integrity of any appeal proceedings – as currently pending – cannot be considered to be a reason to impose conditions on access to...

Application for leave to amend the counterclaim for revocation dismissed (R. 263 RoP). A claimant in a counterclaim for revocation is not free, or at least privileged, to amend its case compared to a claimant in an infringement action. Rather, R. 263 RoP applies in full to a counterclaim for revocation. In any case...

Patent partially invalid (Article 65 UPCA) and infringed (Article 25 UPCA). Inventive step (Article 56 EPC): Problem-solution-approach: to increase legal certainty and further align the case law of the Unified Patent Court with the case law of the EPO and its Boards of Appeal, the problem-solution approach (PSA)...

GEMA argues that the operator of a residential and nursing home must obtain a licence for the transmission of radio and television programmes to the residents. The Advocate General concludes that the [InfoSoc Directive] must be interpreted to mean that the operator of a nursing home does not effect a communication to...

Scope of protection of a design for a component of a modular system (toy building set) to be assessed by reference to the overall impression produced by the design on an informed user who, without being a designer or a technical expert, knows the various designs which exist in the sector concerned, possesses a certain...

HGF is pleased to announce the arrival of three new partners, further strengthening its European presence. Two partners will be joining the firm’s fast-growing French practice, and one will join our accomplished team in Munich, Germany.

Appeal from  order to provide security stayed in entirety for the time that the CFI proceedings are stayed as ordered by the Hamburg Local Division because of insolvency (R. 295m RoP, R. 311.1 RoP). During the stay of the proceedings Easee is not obliged to provide the ordered security and that during the stay of the...

IPPT20250626, UPC CFI, LD Hamburg, Visibly v Easee
If a party is declared insolvent the parties’ representatives are still able to file the stay application under Rule 311.1 RoP.  A stay according to R. 311 RoP is generally a stay of the proceedings as a whole. Due to the stay of the proceedings the three Defendants are...

Suspensive effect granted for appeal from order to provide security by defendant in infringement action because of manifest error (R. 223 RoP, Article 69(4) UPCA). After the impugned order was issued, in other proceedings, the Court of Appeal has ruled that Art.69(4) UPCA does not provide a legal basis for an order to...

Request rejected to release € 56.000 security placed by Ballinno (Article 69(4) UPCA, R. 158 RoP). The evidence presented by Ballinno on the balance on its bank account is insufficient since in the event of a procedural loss, Ballinno must be able to cover both its own litigation costs – which may well exceed the...

Application for rehearing (R. 245 RoP, Article 81 UPCA)) rejected as not allowable. The legislator has explicitly chosen that decisions by the Court of Appeal are to be final. The literal wording of Art. 81(1) UPCA makes clear that a rehearing may exceptionally be granted only if the decision suffers from one of these...

Court fees are considered paid on time (R. 371 RoP) if an order to transfer the due amount to the Court’s bank account has been given to a bank at the time of lodging the relevant pleading or application, provided the payment is subsequently received in the Court’s bank account. This interpretation allows the applicant...

Settlement confirmed by the Court (R. 365.1 RoP). The request for confidentiality from the public under R. 262.2, 365.2 RoP will be decided once a R. 262.1(b) RoP request is made by a member of the public. The confidentiality interests of the parties are protected by the order of the court that only the decision...

The Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre (PMAC) of the UPC forms an integral part of the UPC and will provide institutional support for resolving patent and related disputes through mediation, arbitration, and other alternative dispute resolution methods. With seats in Ljubljana, Slovenia and Lisbon, Portugal, the...

Proceedings stayed at party request to allow fruitful settlement negotiations which are pending between the parties without the pressure of ongoing proceedings before the UPC (R. 295.d RoP)

Suspensive effect rejected (Article 74 UPCA, R. 223 RoP) of appeal against order to communicate information (Article 67 UPCA, Article 8 Enforcement Directive). The provisions of Art. 67 UPCA mirror those of Article 8 of the Enforcement Directive” which, is designed to ensure a high level of protection in all the Member...

Confidentiality club application dismissed (R. 262A RoP) for information to be communicated  pursuant to a court order (Article 67 UPCA). R. 262A RoP applies only to information contained in the pleadings of the parties to the proceedings. Restrictions inherent to the order to provide information on the use of the...

If a time limit provided for in the Rules of Procedure or set by the court has been missed, the party has no option but to apply for re-establishment of the previous status, provided that it is not time limits that cannot be extended (R. 9.3 RoP, R. 320 RoP). The standard of care must be interpreted autonomously (R...