Article 34

Territorial scope of decisions

Decisions of the Court shall cover, in the case of a European patent, the territory of those Contracting Member States for which the European patent has effect.

Case law

IPPT20240802, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Fujifilm v Kodak
erritorial limitation of the amendment was inadmissible, in the absence objective reasons for it (Article 34 UPCA). The new applications, without territorial limitations, are ultimately only a clarification of the previous legal situation, is admissible and allowed under Rule 30(2) RoP. 

IPPT20230630, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, myStromer v Revolt Zycling

Unsuccessful application for rectification under Rule 353 of order so as to include Austria in the  countries covered by provisional injunction. Conflict with the territorial scope provided in article 34 UPC Agreement does not justify a rectification under Rule 353.