IPPT20251107, UPC CoA, Lepu v Occlutech
Application for suspensive effect appeal unfounded (R. 223 RoP, Article 74 UPCA).
Lepu has failed to demonstrate that the Hamburg Local Division’s findings and considerations constitute manifest errors, i.e. factual findings or legal considerations that are clearly untenable even on the basis of a summary assessment.
In addition, Lepu argues that enforcing the provisional injunction would cause damage to its reputation. However, it failed to demonstrate that its interests in preventing such damage outweigh Occlutech’s interests in preventing the imminent patent infringement, as established by the Hamburg Local Division.
