UPC CoA, 1 September 2025: refusal of further written pleadings not manifestly wrong

No discretionary appeal review of panel confirmation of rejection of request for further written pleadings (regarding new allegedly infringing products) (R. 220.3 RoP, R. 36 RoP). 

CFI's exercise of discretion cannot be regarded as manifestly wrong. 

The CFI has not deprived CENTRIPETAL from its right to bring separate actions regarding newly-released infringing products, whether it is AI Stack or any other products from KEYSIGHT or any other third party, so that a risk of res judicata regarding facts and arguments not included in these proceedings has not been established.

IPPT20250901, UPC CoA, Centripetal v Keysight