UPC CFI, LD Paris, 20 January 2025: Evidence not listed exhaustively in R. 170 RoP

Evidence is not set exhaustively in R. 170 RoP. 

NJ wishes to examine the two wigs deposited at the registry (exhibits nos. 861 and 16), position one or more bright lights at the connection areas of the cap, specifically at the band, and take photographs and enlargements of them to show

The measure requested by NJ consists of simple findings and court not experiments within the meaning of Rule 201 RoP. 

The Court considers that the requested probatory measure is unnecessary in that it aims to show the said wigs in detail, whereas enlarged photographs of these wigs appear in NJ's reply brief, as indicated by the defendant. 

IPPT20250120, UPC CFI, LD Paris, NJ Diffusion v Gisela Mayer