UPC CoA, 16 January 2025: Application for suspensive effect appeal rejected
04-02-2025 Print this pageIPPT20250116, UPC CoA, Bhagat v Oerlikon

No suspensive effect of appeal justified (R. 223 RoP, R. 25 RoP)
by (i) a judgement to be expected ‘very soon’ in parallel proceedings, to which Bhagat is not a (intervening) party, and
(ii) an unsubstantiated statement that there are “considerable doubts” as to the validity of the patent while no counterclaim for revocation has been filed in the first instance