UPC CFI LD Dusseldorf, 10 October 2024: No adjournment because of pending appeal on security for costs

Request for adjournment of oral hearing because of outstanding order of the Court of Appeal concerning dismissed request for security for costs dismissed (Article 74(3) UPCA, R. 334 RoP). 

No indication that it may not be efficient and cost effective to hold the oral hearing at this stage. Contrary to the opinion of Defendant the Court must not await a final order of the Court of Appeal on the security of costs before making its own decision on the merits in this case.

IPPT20241010, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Sodastream v Aarke