UPC CoA, 30 September 2024: Time limit extensions are the discretion of the First Instance Court
28-10-2024 Print this pageIPPT20240930, UPC CoA, Xiaomi v Panasonic
No discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) of refusal by Court of First Instance to grant leave to appeal of partial rejection of request for an extension of two months’ time limit (R. 29(d) RoP) by judge-rapporteur and panel (R. 333 RoP).
The period by which a court extends a time limit in a particular case is at the court's discretion.
