IPPT20240906, UPC CoA, Motorola v Ericsson
Request for discretionary review rejected (Rule 220.3 RoP).
Motorola failed to demonstrate that a review of the impugned order is necessary to ensure a consistent application and interpretation of the RoP (point 8 of the Preambule of the RoP) or any other objective of the discretionary review procedure.
Its contention that the impugned order is incorrect and does not provide a detailed interpretation and subsumption that would allow a generalization of the decision, is not sufficient.
