Skip to main content

User account menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Shopping cart 0 items

IP-PorTal is sponsored by:

IP-PorTal Logo

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Sponsors
  • Privacy & terms
  • About
  • Contact

submenu

  • Subject
  • Courts
  • UPC
  • Year
  • Legislation
  • RSS

Advertisements

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. items
  3. IPPT20240805, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Ortovox v Mammut

UPC CFI LD Dusseldorf, 5 August 2024: Double security is too much

20-08-2024 Print this page
IPPT20240805, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Ortovox v Mammut

Security (deposit) to be released when the period for requesting panel review has expired (Rule 333 RoP, Rule 352(2) RoP, Rule 45 Registry Rules). Double security – a deposit and a bank guarantee – can also be the reason and cause for a release decision.

 

IPPT20240805, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Ortovox v Mammut

Back

Advertisements