UPC CFI LD Dusseldorf, 12 July 2024: No translation into English ordered - plaintiff could have chosen English
14-07-2024 Print this pageIPPT20240712, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Seoul Viosys v epert e-Commerce
Inappropriate to order simultaneous translation into English in this case. (Article 49 UPCA, Rule 109 RoP, Rule 14 RoP).
Costs of ordered translation are procedural costs which the other party may have to bear depending on the outcome of the proceedings. Plaintiff was free to decide in favour of conducting the proceedings in English when the action was filed.Plaintiff authorized to hire an interpreter at its own expense.
IPPT20240712, UPC CFI, LD Düsseldorf, Seoul Viosys v epert e-Commerce.