CJEU on the automatic recognition in Liechtenstein of administrative authorisation issued for a medicinal product by SwissMedic

Print this page 14-02-2014
IPPT20131114, CJEU, Astrazeneca v Patent Office

PATENT LAW

 

Administrative authorisation issued for a medicinal product by the Swiss authorities, which is automatically recognized in Liechtenstein, must be regarded as first authorisation to place that product on the market when that authorisation predates marketing authorisations issued for the same medicinal product by EU authorities.


"62. In the context of the European Economic Area (EEA), Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that an administrative authorisation issued for a medicinal product by the Swiss Institute for Medicinal Products (SwissMedic), which is automatically recognised in Liechtenstein, must be regarded as the first authorisation to place that medicinal product on the market within the meaning of that provision in the European Economic Area where that authorisation predates marketing authorisations issued for the same medicinal product, either by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), or by the competent authorities of European Union Member States in accordance with the requirements laid down in Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, and the authorities of the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway. The fact that, on the basis of similar clinical data, the European Medicines Agency, unlike the Swiss authority, refused to grant a marketing authorisation for that medicinal product at the conclusion of its examination of those data, or the fact that the Swiss authorisation to place the product on the market was suspended by the Swiss Institute for Medicinal Products and subsequently reinstated by the latter only when the holder of the authorisation submitted additional data to it are irrelevant."

 

IPPT20131114, CJEU, Astrazeneca v Patent Office

 

C‑617/12 - ECLI:EU:C:2013:761