The owner of an internet connection cannot be exonerated from liability for copyright infringements by naming a family member who might have had access to that connection

IPPT20181018, CJEU, Bastei Lubbe

No risk of confusion between mark with four crossed lines and Asics figurative mark

IPPT20181016, GCEU, Asics v EUIPO
(Courtesy of Bram Woltering and Peter Claassen, AKD)

Richard Prince blames his iPhone in copyright case

IP10145

Colin Kaepernick wants to trademark an image of his face and hair

IP10143

Walmart files patent for carts that track your heart rate

IP10143

Torrent usage on the rise due to increase in exclusive content

IP10140

"Image rights metadata in Google Images"

IP10139

EU trade mark “NEUSCHWANSTEIN” not descriptive and not registered in bad faith

IPPT20180906, CJEU, Souvenir – Geschenke – Ehrenpreise eV v EUIPO

European Parliament votes in favour of new copyright laws

IP10138

Member States are required to recognize a body collectively representing trade mark proprietors if national law allows that body to bring legal proceedings

IPPT20180807, CJEU, SNB-REACT v Deepak Mehta

Posting a presentation written by one of the school's pupils on the school website, which included a photograph that is freely accessible on the internet can be considered as an act of communication to a new public

IPPT20180807, CJEU Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff

CJEU on criteria for products that are "protected by a basic patent in force” in the SPC Regulation for Medicinal Products

IPPT20180725, CJEU, Teva v Gilead

Trade mark propietor is entitled to oppose debranding

IPPT20180725, CJEU, Mitsubishi v Duma