Cost decision on the reimbursability of costs in PI proceedings (Article. 69 UPCA, Rule. 150, 151, 152 RoP). Costs incurred in PI proceedings are reimbursable separately. The decision on the reimbursability of costs is to be taken in a uniform cost procedure following the proceedings on the merits. The ceilings for PI...

Freedom of expression – Civil sanctions imposed on a publisher for printing a photo of a well-known politician and his family alongside a photo of the family of Nazi politician Joseph Goebbels in the satirical section of a weekly magazine. The domestic courts were required to balance the publisher’s right to freedom of...

The CJEU held that a national remuneration scheme imposing a levy on storage media sold to professional purchasers is compatible with the InfoSoc Directive, provided that a rebuttable presumption exists. Producers, importers, or distributors may be required to pay fair compensation unless they demonstrate that the...

IPPT.eu is pleased to announce that Powell Gilbert has joined the platform as a Multi User Sponsor. The sponsorship supports IPPT.eu’s mission to publish European intellectual property case law and legal texts in a structured, searchable and practitioner-friendly format.

IPPT.eu provides extensive collections of CJEU...

WTO members must not frustrate the patent owner’s ability to exercise the exclusive rights conferred on it (Article 28.1 TRIPS) by another WTO Member […], i.e. to prevent third parties not having the patent owner's consent from making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing the patented products. ASI policy...

Lego brought an action before the General Court against EUIPO’s decision declaring its registered Community design for a toy building block invalid, following a request by Qman Toys for lack of individual character. EUIPO found that the design produced the same overall impression as an earlier design. The General Court...

IPPT.eu hereby informs users that access to certain website functionalities will be subject to a subscription-based access model starting February 1st. After many years of providing free services to law firms, patent attorneys, and institutions, the platform is taking the next step in enhancing its legal research...

Application for suspensive effect dismissed. (Rule 223 RoP). Amazon has not established that irreversible harm is imminent and that not ordering suspensive effect would render the appeal-at-hand devoid of purpose. Enforcement (Rule. 354.4 RoP). The risk that the court may initiate penalty proceedings of its own motion ...

Confirmed ex-parte interim measure (R. 209.4 RoP, R. 212.3 RoP) prohibiting anti-suit injunctions or equivalent measures preventing pursuing patent infringement proceedings before UPC based on their European patents subject to the jurisdiction of the UPC (Article 56 UPCA). 

Withdrawal of the appeal against revocation permitted, proceedings closed.  (Rule. 370 RoP). R. 370.9 (b) RoP has been amended from 1 January 2026, providing for reimbursement of court fees with 50 % in case of the withdrawal of an action before the closure of the written procedure instead of, as previously, 60 %. The...

The EU General Court, like EUIPO, refuses the application for a motion mark showing the opening and closing of a window, because the sign merely represents a technical functional process. The essential characteristics of the sign are technically necessary to achieve a result, such as ventilation and stability. Article...

Appeal rejected: patent revocation upheld.  Late filed new grounds for invalidity in first instance Defence to application to amend . (Rule 32 RoP, Rule. 263 RoP) . Defence to the Application to amend the patent does not provide an opportunity to introduce new grounds of invalidity in relation to the patent, such as...

Request for discretionary review of procedural order dismissed. (Rule 220 RoP). A request for discretionary review can only be allowed after the other party has been heard pursuant to R. 220.4 Rop. If allowed, this sets in motion a procedural appeal under a procedural appeal under R. 220.2 RoP. 

Limited access to written pleadings and evidence granted to law firm (Rule. 262. RoP). The documents shall be redacted of personal data prior to making them available. A law firm is also  a member of the public within the meaning of R. 262.1 (b) RoP. Commercial interests with the application does not preclude an...

Request for access to written pleadings and evidence rejected.  (Art. 45 UPCA , Rule. 262.1(b) RoP). Copyright is not a general interest that must be observed when a member of the public requests access to the register. Granting access to written pleadings and evidence to a company, which intends to make the...

Appeal on change of language proceedings dismissed. (Article 49 UPCA). Parties not being domiciled in countries where the language of the proceedings chosen by the claimant is an official language is an important factor in a decision on an application to use the language of the patent. Relevant circumstances should be...

Application for suspensive effect successful. (Article 74 UPCA,  Rule 223 RoP). TP link denied access to written submissions. Order made without prior hearing of the applicant due to the limited time remaining before the expiry of the implementation period. Applicant given opportunity to comment on the application for...

Award of damages (Art. 68 (1) UPCA, Rule 112 RoP). Knowledge of infringement. An active stakeholder in the industry is expected to monitor the patent landscape before exhibiting its product on the market and should have reasonable grounds to know about the existence of the Patent and the infringing nature of the...

European patent revoked (Article 65 UPCA)  Added subject matter (Article 138 EPC) . The removal or replacement of a feature is not considered added-subject matter if the feature is not described as being essential in the application. Any features which, even if mentioned throughout the application in the context of the...

Leave to appeal against cost decisions denied. (R. 221.RoP). It is evident from the order that the judge-rapporteur has made a thorough and detailed assessment of the costs.