Jurisdiction and competence of the court. (Article 33 UPCA). CD Paris lacks jurisdiction to hear the infringement action against defendants not named in the previous order. (Article 33 (1) UPCA). Although the order was issued without hearing two companies, it took into account the situation corresponding to multiple...

Request for suspensive effect rejected due to lack of exceptional circumstances (Article 74 UPCA, Rule 223.1 RoP). Appellant has not argued that the decision is manifestly flawed, or that the decision is based on a breach of a fundamental procedural right. In the application for suspensive effect, appellant does not...

Patent valid and infringed (Article 65 UPCA , Article 25(a) UPCA , Article 26 UPCA). Permanent injunction granted for recall and destruction of goods. (Article 63(1) UPCA) the defendant markets and uses the invention of the patent. Advertising materials are excluded from destruction (Article 64 (2)(e) UPCA) because...

Preliminary injunction granted in appeal (R. 211 RoP, R. 242 RoP). Claim construction (Article 69 EPC). Claim 1 only requires that the monitored glucose levels and the event data icons are included in the same timeline graph. The claim does not require both to be in the same area of the graph or within a certain range...

Jurisdiction (Article 31 UPCA). By not contesting the jurisdiction and competence of the Court in First Instance, the Appellant (Defendant in first instance) has in principle foregone this opportunity on appeal and cannot raise the alleged lack of jurisdiction and competence as a ground for overturning the impugned...

A party or its representative may prepare a private transcript of an oral hearing, based on an audio recording pursuant  R. 115 RoP. When producing a private transcript, a party or its representative may obtain support of an assistant or support staff, such as a stenographer, working in the presence and under the...

Appeal dismissed of rejection of provisional measures (Article 62 UPCA, R. 206 RoP, R. 211 RoP). Admissibility of auxiliary requests in provisional measures proceedings (R. 30 RoP, R. 222 RoP). Asserting a patent in an amended (non-granted) form is not automatically inadmissible and depends on the circumstances of the...

The principle that parties shall set out their full case as early as possible in the proceedings (RoP, Preamble, paragraph 7, last sentence) also applies to applications for suspensive effect. This means that an application for suspensive effect must set out all the reasons, facts, evidence and arguments on which the...

The Court of First Instance has case management discretion to either decide on the Preliminary objection as soon as practicable or decide to deal with the Preliminary objection in the main proceedings (R. 19 RoP, R. 20 RoP, R. 102.1 RoP, R. 331.1 RoP). The decision to deal with the Preliminary objection in the main...

IPPT.eu is pleased to announce that Meissner Bolte has joined the platform as a Multi User Sponsor. The sponsorship supports IPPT.eu’s mission to publish European intellectual property case law and legal texts in a structured, searchable and practitioner-friendly format.

Infringement order in respect of all Contracting States (Article 25 UPCA, Article 34 UPCA). For an order to be issued in respect of all Contracting Member States in which the patent is in force, it is sufficient to determine an infringing act in one Contracting Member State. This applies even if an infringing act can...

Trade secrets or other confidential information ae no longer trade secrets or other confidential information if they are disclosed to the other party without an order pursuant to R. 262A RoP, or without any other restriction, for example an agreement between the parties or a voluntary undertaking. A request under R...

Claim construction (Article 69 EPC). Statements made by the applicant during the grant proceedings do not constitute interpretative material for the interpretation of the granted patent within the meaning of Article 69(1) EPC. Nor are such statements by the applicant during the grant proceedings binding for the...

Dismissal of revocation action (Article 65 |UPCA) and of infringement action (Article 25 UPCA). Jurisdiction of the UPC in infringement action regarding all defendants, including Spanish defendant (Article 8 Brussels I) for the allegedly in

Panel review confirms dismissal of Preliminary objection (R. 19 RoP, R. 333 RoP). Parent and subsidiary companies are not automatically “same parties” (Article 33(4) UPCA): depends on having the same or independent business activities. The assessment of the unity of the undertaking in the context of an antitrust action...

A party submitting a request to lay open books for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation pursuant to R. 213.2 RoP is liable for both the fixed fee and the value-based fee for the determination of damages (R. 132 RoP). Fees for compensation are not included in fees for provisional measures; they are...

Defence of abuse of rights can be considered by the UPC. Production of emails allegedly showing that the first claimant had acted, including the acquisition of […], with the aim of securing a dominant position in the SST market, and that the second claimant was aware that the […] l

Revocation of ex parte inspection order confirmed. Duty to disclose any known material fact which might influence the Court (R. 192.3 RoP). Is there so that the Court can take due account of the interests of both parties, in spite of having to rely only on the facts presented in the Application. Representatives are...

Provisional measures cease to have effect at the defendant's request if the applicant has not instituted proceedings within the period laid down in Article 9(5) of Directive 2004/48 [Enforcement Directive].  Article 9(5) Enforcement Directive covers a broad range of provisional measures and does not preclude...

Withdrawal of appeal by party consent (R. 265 RoP). Appellant ordered to bear the respondent’s costs. As a general rule, in the event of a withdrawal of an appeal, the appellant shall be considered to be the unsuccessful party and shall bear the costs incurred in relation to the appeal proceedings